Since 2021, a new regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector applies to all EU market participants, including Planet A. Under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation – SFDR funds are classified according to their ESG commitment and positive contribution to environmental and social objectives.
Article 9 funds have a sustainable investment objective with a strong ESG focus. Planet A meets this requirement by investing in start-ups which (1) contribute significantly to an environmental objective; (2) do not harm environmental or social objectives; and (3) follow good governance practices.
We support and welcome the move towards greater transparency in sustainability related disclosures for the industry.
I. Sustainability risks
Planet A GmbH (“Planet A”, LEI: 391200YUE7N8O4IU6R41) takes sustainability risks into account in its investment decision-making process. Sustainability risks are environmental, social or governance events or conditions that, if they occur, could cause an actual or a potential material negative effect on the value of the investments. As part of its standard procedure, Planet A conducts a due diligence prior to investing that includes an assessment of sustainability risks. The results of these assessments guide Plant A`s investment decisions. In its free discretion, Planet A may decide to make an investment even if sustainability risks have been determined. In such cases, Planet A may apply appropriate mitigation measures.
II. Statement on principal adverse impacts of investment decisions on sustainability factors
Summary
Planet A considers principal adverse impacts of its investment decisions on sustainability factors. The present statement is the first consolidated statement on principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors of Planet A.
This statement on principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors covers the reference period from 01 January 2023 to 31 December 2023.
Sustainability factors include environmental, social and employee concerns, respect for human rights and the fight against corruption and bribery. Planet A applied a set of sustainability indicators at portfolio company level. This contains the mandatory indicators as set forth in no. 1 to 14 of Table 1 of Annex I of the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 (“RTS”) as well as the indicators no. [5] of table 2 and no. [12] of table 3 of Annex I. At all times, Planet A applied the principle of proportionality taking due account of the strategic relevance of an investment as well as its transactional context.
In general, the startups in the Fund’s portfolio did not have a significant negative impact. The portfolio companies held in 2023 are all early-stage startups that only have a minor operative footprint. There are numerous software companies among them that have very low emissions per se. In case of hard ware companies most were in lab or demo stages in 2023. At the same time, the products and services of these startups all have a significant positive impact on environmental and climate protection that far exceeds the operational emissions. We demonstrate this in publicly available life cycle assessments on our website.
In some categories, like GHG emissions, not all companies were able to contribute data. In order to improve the data generation and assessment we recently partnered with the ESG service provider APIDAY. In the future, we will continue to provide support in generating the data needed to portfolio companies.
Zusammenfassung
Planet A berücksichtigt die wichtigsten nachteiligen Auswirkungen der Investitionsentscheidungen auf Nachhaltigkeitsfaktoren. Bei der vorliegenden Erklärung handelt es sich um die erste konsolidierte Erklärung zu den wichtigsten nachteiligen Auswirkungen auf die Nachhaltigkeitsfaktoren von Planet A.
Diese Erklärung zu den wichtigsten nachteiligen Auswirkungen auf die Nachhaltigkeitsfaktoren bezieht sich auf den Bezugszeitraum vom 1. Januar 2023 bis zum 31. Dezember 2023.
Nachhaltigkeitsfaktoren sind Umwelt-, Sozial- und Arbeitnehmerbelange, Achtung der Menschenrechte und die Bekämpfung von Korruption und Bestechung. Planet A wendet dabei eine Reihe Nachhaltigkeitsindikatoren auf Ebene der Portfoliounternehmen an. Diese enthält die verpflichtenden Indikatoren gemäß Nr. 1 bis 14 der Tabelle 1 des Anhangs I der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2022/1288 (“RTS”) sowie die Indikatoren Nr. [5] der Tabelle 2 und Nr. [12] der Tabelle 3 des Anhangs I. Planet A wird stets den Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit anwenden und sowohl die strategische Bedeutung einer Investition als auch ihren Transaktionskontext berücksichtigen.
Im Allgemeinen hatten die Startups im Fondsportfolio keine nennenswerten negativen Auswirkungen auf Umwelt- und Klimaschutz. Bei den Portfoliounternehmen, die wir 2023 im Bestand hatten, handelt es sich durchweg um Startups im Frühstadium, die nur einen geringen operativen Fußabdruck haben. Darunter befinden sich zahlreiche Softwareunternehmen, die per se sehr geringere Emissionen aufweisen. Wenn es sich um Hardware-Unternehmen handelt, befanden sich diese 2023 zumeist im Labor- oder Demostadium. Gleichzeitig haben die Produkte und Dienstleistungen dieser Startups alle einen signifikanten positiven Einfluss auf den Umwelt- und Klimaschutz, der die operativen Emissionen weit übersteigt. Dies zeigen wir in öffentlich zugänglichen Ökobilanzen auf unserer Website.
In einigen Kategorien, wie z. B. Treibhausgasemissionen, konnten nicht alle Unternehmen Daten beisteuern. Um die Datengenerierung und -auswertung weiter zu verbessern sind wir kürzlich eine Zusammenarbeit mit dem ESG Serviceanbieter Apiday eingegangen. Im kommenden Jahr werden wir den Portfoliounternehmen gezieltere Unterstützung bei der Generierung der benötigten Daten bieten.
Description of the principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors
Planet A considers the adverse sustainability indicators as set forth in the table below.
Description of policies to identify and prioritise principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors
Planet A has established and implemented an ESG policy as well as sustainability clauses as part of the shareholder agreements to identify and prioritise principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors. These policies have been approved by the governing body of Planet A on 01.10.2021. The responsibility for their implementation and application has been allocated to Christian Schad.
The indicators as set forth in no. 1 to 14 in the table above are mandatory according to the RTS. All other indicators were chosen by Planet A by taking into account their relevance with respect to Planet A’s business strategy.
Prior to any investment, Planet A conducts a due diligence. Part of this due diligence includes checking whether the investment could have an adverse impact on sustainability factors. This check is performed by using an ESG questionnaire which, inter alia, includes the adverse sustainability indicators considered by Planet A at portfolio level (see above).
After an investment, i.e., during the holding period, Planet A checks for adverse impacts on sustainability factors in regular intervals. The relevant data is collected annually by using the table above. At the end of each reference period, Planet A aggregates the relevant data. When assessing principal adverse impacts, Planet A prioritises the adverse impacts by taking into account the probability of occurrence and the severity of those impacts.
To the extent possible, Planet A uses publicly available information relating to any of the adverse sustainability indicators. Where information is not publicly available, Planet A primarily obtains it by making reasonable assumptions or directly from the portfolio companies. Thus, errors cannot be excluded completely. Yet, Planet A will always endeavour to identify such errors or inaccuracies and to intervene as appropriate.
The so described policies will be re-evaluated on a regular basis, i.e., annually, in particular to reflect any legal or regulatory changes as well as data availability and further developments in the market. Hence, in the future, Planet A may also use other indicators to identify and assess additional principal adverse impacts.
Engagement policies
Planet A established an ESG policy and aims to insert sustainability clauses into the termsheets and shareholder agreements to reduce the principal adverse impacts assessed through the indicators set forth in the table above in accordance with its set targets: Planet A will engage with its portfolio companies to discuss any (potential) principal adverse impacts. Where there is no reduction of principal adverse impacts over more than one period, Planet A will consult with the Company’s management and identify the causes. In addition, in such a case, together with the management of the Company, a set of measures will be developed in order to reduce PAIs in the future. In the unlikely event that no positive development can be reported and the negative impacts are substantial, Planet A might consider the sale of its stake in the company.
References to international standardsPlanet A is a signatory of the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investments (UNPRI), the Finance for Biodiversity Pledge as well as the Leaders for Climate Action`s (LfCA) pledge. Planet A is committed to the objectives of the UNFCCC Paris Agreement.
III. Remuneration disclosure
As a registered alternative investment fund manager within the meaning of section 2 (4) of the German Investment Code (Kapitalanlagegesetzbuch, “KAGB”) and a manager of a qualifying venture capital fund as defined in article 3 (b) of Regulation (EU) No. 345/2013 (“EuVECA-Regulation”), Planet A does not have and does not need to have a remuneration guideline or policy in accordance with the requirements of the KAGB or the EuVECA Regulation.
IV. Sustainability-related disclosures
Below One Fund I GmbH & Co. KG
Financial product: Below One Fund I GmbH & Co. KG GmbH & Co. KG (the “Fund” / der “Fonds”)
LEI: 391200R47ECQMGPUOH32
Summary
The Fund pursues a venture capital strategy and has sustainable investments as its objective. Sustainable investment pursuant to Art. 2(17) SFDR means an investment in an economic activity that contributes to an environmental or social objective, provided that the investment does not significantly harm any environmental or social objective and that the investee companies follow good governance practices.
All of the Fund’s sustainable investments are – at the same time – investments in an environmentally sustainable economic activity within the meaning of the Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (“Taxonomy”).
No index as reference benchmark has been designated (Art. 9(1) SFDR).
In order to determine the sustainability of a potential investment, life cycle assessments (“LCA”), among other things, are conducted as part of the due diligence process during the investment decision process. Furthermore, (potential) portfolio companies are required to complete an ESG questionnaire, which, inter alia, requests information on (adverse) sustainability indicators. The LCAs are amended as soon as new products or processes need to be taken into account. The portfolio companies are requested to report on ESG on an annual basis and ad-hoc in case of severe breaches.
In the absence of publicly available data, the Fund either collects data for the LCAs and the (adverse) sustainability indicators directly from its (potential) portfolio companies, bases them on scientific studies or estimates them appropriately. In this respect, there is a risk of false information.
The actions and decisions described in the following sections are each made by Planet A for and on behalf of the Fund.
Zusammenfassung
Der Fonds verfolgt eine Wagniskapitalstrategie und strebt nachhaltige Investitionen an. Eine nachhaltige Investition ist nach Art. 2(17) SFDR eine Investition in eine wirtschaftliche Tätigkeit, die zu einem ökologischen oder sozialen Ziel beiträgt, vorausgesetzt, dass die Investition kein ökologisches oder soziales Ziel wesentlich beeinträchtigt und dass die Unternehmen, in die investiert wird, eine gute Unternehmensführung haben.
Bei den nachhaltigen Investitionen des Fonds handelt es sich zugleich um Investitionen in ökologisch nachhaltige Wirtschaftstätigkeiten im Sinne der Verordnung (EU) 2020/852 („Taxonomie“).
Ein Index als Referenzwert wurde nicht bestimmt.
Zur Ermittlung der Nachhaltigkeit eines potenziellen Investments werden im Rahmen des Due-Diligence Prozesses, welcher vor jeder Investitionsentscheidung erfolgt, u.a. Life Cycle Assessments (“LCA”) durchgeführt. Ferner ist von den (potenziellen) Portfoliounternehmen ein ESG-Fragebogen auszufüllen, in dem u.a. Informationen zu den Nachhaltigkeitsindikatoren sowie den Nachhaltigkeitsindikatoren für nachteilige Auswirkungen abfragt werden. Die LCAs werden ergänzt, sobald neue Prozesse und Produkte berücksichtigt werden müssen. Die Portfoliounternehmen sind angehalten, jährlich zu ESG zu berichten – im Fall von Vorfällen ad-hoc.
Bei Fehlen öffentlich verfügbarer Daten, erhebt der Fonds die Daten für die LCAs sowie die Nachhaltigkeitsindikatoren (für nachhaltige Auswirkungen) entweder direkt von den (potenziellen) Portfoliounternehmen, auf Grundlage wissenschaftlicher Literatur oder schätzt diese angemessen. Insoweit besteht ein Risiko von Falschinformationen.
Die in den folgenden Abschnitten beschriebenen Handlungen und Entscheidungen erfolgen jeweils durch Planet A für den Fonds.
No significant harm to the sustainable investment objective
The Fund’s investments not only avoid harm but generate significant positive outcomes for the planet. In order to assess whether an investment does not significantly harm any of the sustainable investment objectives, the Fund conducts a due diligence prior to each investment which includes an LCA to assess the environmental footprint of a potential portfolio company’s product or service as well as an ESG questionnaire to identify and assess any principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors. The ESG questionnaire contains the sustainability indicators 1 – 14 of Table 1 of Annex I of the RTS as well as indicator 5 of Table 2 and 12 of Table 3 of Annex I of the RTS. Conversely, as long as no principal adverse impacts are identified for a portfolio company of the Fund, it can be assumed that the Fund’s sustainable investments do not cause significant harm to any environmental or social investment objective.
Furthermore, the Fund strives to be fully aligned with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. For that purpose, the Fund has integrated a set of ESG related questions (including the alignment with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights) in its pre-investment ESG questionnaire as well as in the post-investment monitoring and support processes.
Sustainable investment objective of the financial product
The Fund has sustainable investment as its objective (cf. Art. 9(2) SFDR). No index has been designated as a reference benchmark (Art. 9(1) SFDR).
The Fund is an impact venture capital fund supporting green technology companies that have a quantifiable positive impact on the planet while building scalable businesses. The Fund wants to contribute to an economy that operates within the planetary boundaries and make impact investment the new ‘normal’.
Therefore, the Fund’s sustainable investment objective is to achieve significant reductions in at least one of the following four key areas: GHG emissions, waste generation, resource exploitation and/or biodiversity loss. As part of the LCAs, the Fund measures the attainment of its sustainable investment objective through sustainability indicators which are defined for each portfolio company individually after an investment of the Fund. Such sustainability indicator(s) is/are tracked and reported annually.
Pursuant to Art. 5 lit. (a) Taxonomy, the Fund’s investments in general will contribute to climate change mitigation.
Investment strategy
The purpose of the Fund is to build, hold and manage (including to divest) a portfolio of equity and equity-related and mezzanine investments (including convertible loans and subordinated revenue-based financing instruments (nachrangige partiarische Darlehen) in portfolio companies with a potential positive impact on planet earth.
The Fund shall, in principle, pursue a long term and sustainable investment strategy. Therefore, the Fund only invests in early-stage start-ups that have
The Fund’s targeted investment sectors are energy, mobility, agtech&food, buildings, manufacturing, water and waste and IT/enabling technologies. The Fund intends to invest in Europe (+Israel) and to make its initial investments in early stage, i.e., seed and series A rounds, of green technology companies. The Fund will not invest in companies that are not part of the solution to the climate and environmental crisis.
Good governance practices are assessed through an ESG checklist as part of every due diligence process prior to any investment made by the Fund. Such practices include, in particular, sound management structures, employee relations, remuneration of staff and tax compliance within the portfolio companies. Moreover, the Fund will conduct annular surveys of the ESG practices in its portfolio companies during the holding period. If the Fund becomes aware of severe governance issues, it will investigate them and work with all parties involved to find an appropriate solution.
Proportion of investments
The Fund will invest fully in line with its investment strategy and investment restrictions, i.e., it will only make sustainable investments (100 %). Currently, 100 % of the sustainable investments with an environmental objective are Taxonomy-aligned. The Fund intends to only invest in economic activities that qualify as environmentally sustainable under the Taxonomy. Therefore, the minimum share of sustainable investments with an environmental objective that are not aligned with the Taxonomy is 0 %.
The Fund does not invest in transitional economic activities. Therefore, the minimum share of investments in transitional economic activities is 0 %. As the fund intends to invest in enabling (software) technologies that help others to generate a significant positive impact the minimum share expressed as a percentage of all investments of the Fund, is at least 1 %.
The degree to which the Fund’s sustainable investments are investments in environmentally sustainable economic activities is measured (by default) by turnover. Where information about the degree to which an investment in a (potential) portfolio company is in an environmentally sustainable economic activity is not readily available from public disclosures, such information will be obtained directly from the (potential) portfolio company.
Furthermore, the Fund and its portfolio companies comply with the minimum safeguards of Art. 18 Taxonomy.
The compliance of the investments with the Taxonomy will not be subject to an assurance by auditors or a review by third parties but the results of the impact assessments are all shared publicly on the website of Planet A.
Monitoring of the sustainable investment objective
In order to monitor the sustainable investment objective and the sustainability indicators used to measure the attainment of the sustainable investment objective throughout the lifecycle of the Fund, impact performance data is being assessed on an annual basis. LCA data and models are updated on a regular basis in consultation with the Fund’s portfolio companies to reflect changes in their processes or products.
In addition, ESG-related information is collected and evaluated via an ESG questionnaire which is provided every year to the Fund’s portfolio companies. The (adverse) sustainability indicators for each portfolio company are also tracked on an annual basis using the ESG questionnaire.
Furthermore, the Fund requires its portfolio companies to provide an incident report in written form, if they become aware of any issue presenting a material risk for the realization of the Fund’s sustainable investment objective.
Methodologies
In order to measure the attainment of the sustainable investment objective, a full-fledged science team within Planet A, for and on behalf of the Fund, uses a rigid science-based impact methodology that assesses the climate and environmental impact of each of the Fund’s investments. In order to quantify the impact of a portfolio company’s innovative product or service the Fund conducts the LCAs, i.e., assesses the climate and other environmental impacts associated with all stages of a product’s life – from raw material extraction through materials processing, manufacture, distribution, and use. By comparing the results with reference products on the market, the Fund can assess how much better a (potential) portfolio company’s innovation is (= improvement rate). The impact is calculated by assessing the environmental improvement (impact perspective) and the growth of a company (business perspective). After an investment decision, i.e., during the holding period, the Fund defines one to maximum four sustainability indicators for each portfolio company: tons of GHG emissions, energy demand, resource consumption and/or tons of waste. In cases where the Fund invests in enabling technology companies, i.e., companies that support third parties to decrease their ecological footprint, proxies are used as sustainability indicators.
Data sources and processing
The LCA data on a portfolio company’s product or service is sourced from the company itself. Where there is no specific data available on production processes and resources used the data is modelled or sourced from peer reviewed scientific studies. The LCAs are conducted by LCA experts who are extensively trained in LCAs norms and standards. They have access to well documented process data from the globally most widely used LCA databases.
In order to report and forecast the impact, the portfolio companies provide Planet A with current and projected business data (units sold, customers acquired etc.) in correspondence with the business plan. LCA data and models are updated on a regular basis in consultation with the portfolio companies to reflect changes in the company’s processes or products. In addition, target markets of start-ups are being monitored to detect and include significant changes that might affect the environmental performance of a portfolio company. This data is stored in Planet A`s data warehouse. No customer data will be requested or stored.
Limitations to methodologies and data
The information collected from the (potential) portfolio companies is internally or externally verified only if and to the extent misrepresentations are suspected. Thus, it cannot be ruled out completely that false information may remain undetected in certain cases. As the Fund’s investments are made for several years, the Fund considers it a priority to establish and maintain a trustful working relationship with its portfolio companies in order to ensure compliance with its sustainable investment objective. Further limitations, in particular with regard to the accuracy of the data and reliability of the data sources used, are not apparent at this time.
Due diligence
An initial assessment of how an investment relates to the sustainable investment objective of the Fund is carried out as part of the due diligence process. Therefore, the due diligence process includes inter alia a full LCA (if applicable) and forecasting of the (potential) portfolio company’s product or service by Planet A’s impact team, an ESG checklist and a technical assessment. The latter is validated by technical experts either within the Planet A network or through professionally conducted assessments, if applicable. For the other parts, an internal or external review or verification of the information obtained will only be carried out if misrepresentations are suspected.
Engagement policies
Engagement forms part of the sustainable investment objective of the Fund. With the Fund, Planet A aims to generate positive impact beyond the Fund’s portfolio companies by sharing learnings and scientific insights, cooperating with other Venture Capital funds as well as public institutions and foundations in order to advance the whole ecosystem. Planet A, for instance, takes an active role in the advisory board of the EXIST program or the Sustainable Finance Advisory Committee of the German Government as well as the Clean Tech for Europe Initiative, the Nature Investor Circle, the UNPRI Spring initiative or the Finance@Biodiversity Initiative of the European Commission. Our objective is to make impact investment the new normal. We will continue to actively communicate and publish our ambitions and findings. This will also include advocacy to strengthen social entrepreneurship, purpose companies, more stringent impact measurement standards as well as more ambitious environmental legislation.
Planet A commits to adhere to ESG principles with regard to its own organization as well as the Fund. As venture capital investor, the influence Planet A has on the Fund’s portfolio companies through shareholdings, including influence on sustainability matters, is typically limited. However, Planet A will apply its best efforts to encourage the Fund’s portfolio companies to agree with the Fund’s ESG policy, and to commit to pursuing its ESG commitments. When sustainability-related issues are detected, the Fund encourages and supports actions for improvement.
Attainment of the sustainable investment objective
The Fund’s sustainable investment objective is to achieve significant reductions in at least one of the following four key areas: GHG emissions, waste generation, resource exploitation and/or biodiversity loss. In order to measure the attainment of this sustainable investment objective, Planet A, for and on behalf of the Fund, applies the following sustainability indicators: tons of GHG emissions, energy demand, resource consumption and/or tons of waste. With regards to enabling technology companies, i.e., companies that support third parties to decrease their ecological footprint, proxies are used. The Fund uses a science-based methodology that assesses the climate and environmental impact of all its (potential) investments. In order to quantify the impact of a start-up’s innovative product or service, the Fund assesses by means of a LCA the climate and other environmental impacts associated with all stages of a product’s life – from raw material extraction through materials processing, manufacture, distribution, and use.
The Fund thus not only assesses the GHG emissions involved but gets a broader understanding of emissions, including plastic, water, land use footprints. By comparing the results with reference products on the market, the Fund can assess how much better a start-up’s innovation is (= improvement rate). Impact is calculated by assessing the environmental improvement (impact perspective) and the growth of a company (business perspective). After making an investment decision, the Fund will define one to maximum four impact long-term (5 years) targets to be tracked and reported on an annual basis. These KPIs are quantifiable and linked to the environmental outcome(s) the portfolio company aims to achieve. In cases where the Fund invests in nascent technologies that may achieve major environmental impact only in the long run the Fund will use proxies as impact KPIs.
Below One Fund II GmbH & Co. KG
Financial product: Below One Fund II GmbH & Co. KG GmbH & Co. KG (“BoF II”)
LEI: 391200KYM154WPESX735
Summary
BoF II pursues a venture capital strategy and has sustainable investments as its objective. Sustainable investment pursuant to Art. 2(17) SFDR means an investment in an economic activity that contributes to an environmental or social objective, provided that the investment does not significantly harm any environmental or social objective and that the investee companies follow good governance practices.
All of BoF II’s sustainable investments are – at the same time – investments in an environmentally sustainable economic activity within the meaning of the Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (“Taxonomy”).
No index as reference benchmark has been designated (Art. 9(1) SFDR).
In order to determine the sustainability of a potential investment, life cycle assessments (“LCA”), among other things, are conducted as part of the due diligence process during the investment decision process. Furthermore, (potential) portfolio companies are required to complete an ESG questionnaire, which, inter alia, assesses principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors as part of the pre-investment due diligence as well as the post-investment monitoring and support processes.
After an investment decision, BoF II defines impact key performance indicator(s) (“KPI”), i.e., sustainability indicators, to measure the attainment of its sustainable investment objective. Such indicator(s) is/are defined for each portfolio company individually, subject to approval by the main investors, and such indicator(s) is/are tracked and reported annually.
BoF II checks for adverse impacts on sustainability factors in regular intervals. Where information is not publicly available, the relevant data is collected either directly from the portfolio companies by using a table/dashboard application or by making reasonable assumptions. In this respect, there is a risk of false information.
The actions and decisions described in the following sections are each made by Planet A for and on behalf of BoF II.
Zusammenfassung
BoF II verfolgt eine Wagniskapitalstrategie und strebt nachhaltige Investitionen an. Eine nachhaltige Investition ist nach Art. 2(17) SFDR eine Investition in eine wirtschaftliche Tätigkeit, die zu einem ökologischen oder sozialen Ziel beiträgt, vorausgesetzt, dass die Investition kein ökologisches oder soziales Ziel wesentlich beeinträchtigt und dass die Unternehmen, in die investiert wird, eine gute Unternehmensführung haben.
Bei den nachhaltigen Investitionen des Fonds handelt es sich zugleich um Investitionen in ökologisch nachhaltige Wirtschaftstätigkeiten im Sinne der Verordnung (EU) 2020/852 („Taxonomie“).
Ein Index als Referenzwert wurde nicht bestimmt.
Zur Ermittlung der Nachhaltigkeit eines potenziellen Investments werden im Rahmen des Due-Diligence Prozesses, welcher vor jeder Investitionsentscheidung erfolgt, u.a. Life Cycle Assessments („LCA”) durchgeführt. Darüber hinaus müssen (potenzielle) Portfoliounternehmen einen ESG-Fragebogen ausfüllen, der unter anderem die wesentlichen nachteiligen Auswirkungen auf Nachhaltigkeitsfaktoren im Rahmen der Due-Diligence vor der Investition sowie der Überwachungs- und Unterstützungsprozesse nach der Investition bewertet.
Nach einer Investitionsentscheidung definiert BoF II Impact-Kennzahlen („KPI“), d.h. Nachhaltigkeitsindikatoren, um die Erreichung seines nachhaltigen Investitionsziels zu messen. Diese Indikatoren werden individuell für jedes Portfoliounternehmen festgelegt, vorbehaltlich der Genehmigung durch die Hauptinvestoren, und jährlich nachverfolgt und berichtet.
BoF II prüft in regelmäßigen Abständen die nachteiligen Nachhaltigkeitsauswirkungen. Wo Informationen nicht öffentlich verfügbar sind, werden die relevanten Daten entweder direkt von den Portfoliounternehmen über eine Tabellen-/Dashboard-Anwendung erhoben oder durch angemessene Annahmen ermittelt. In diesem Zusammenhang besteht das Risiko falscher Informationen.
Die in den folgenden Abschnitten beschriebenen Handlungen und Entscheidungen werden jeweils von Planet A für und im Namen von BoF II getroffen.
No significant harm to the sustainable investment objective
The indicators for adverse impacts on sustainability factors, i.e., the sustainability indicators 1 – 14 of Table 1 of Annex I of the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 (“RTS”) as well as indicator 5 of Table 2 and 12 of Table 3 of Annex I of the RTS will be taken into account. Further, all indicators from Table 2 and Table 3 that are relevant for a specific investment will be taken into account. In addition, the technical screening criteria (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 and (EU) 2023/2486) will be used to determine that there is no significant harm caused to any other environmental objective.
To exclude any possible adverse effects, BoF II conducts a due diligence prior to each investment which includes a LCA or, where an LCA is not applicable, a scientific literature review to assess the environmental impact of a (potential) portfolio company’s product or service. BoF II uses an ESG questionnaire to identify and assess principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors as part of the pre-investment due diligence as well as in the post-investment monitoring and support processes.
At the point of investment, Planet A takes best effort to integrate sustainability clauses in term sheets and shareholder agreements, requiring the investees to adopt and adhere to a strong governance framework. The provisions reflect the Minimum Safeguard requirements of the EU Taxonomy, which includes the respect for human rights (incl. labor rights), anti-corruption, responsible taxation, and fair competition and are based on compliance with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Furthermore, BoF II has integrated a set of ESG related questions (including the alignment with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights) in its pre-investment ESG questionnaire as well as in the post-investment monitoring and support processes.
Sustainable investment objective of the financial product
BoF II has sustainable investment as its objective (cf. Art. 9(2) SFDR). It is an impact venture capital fund supporting green technology companies that have a quantifiable positive impact on the planet while building scalable businesses. BoF II wants to contribute to an economy within the planetary boundaries and make impact investment the new ‘normal’.
BoF II will only make sustainable investments within the meaning of Art. 2(17) SFDR in economic activities that qualify as environmentally sustainable under the EU Taxonomy. While there are no relevant reference benchmarks available that can be applied to BoF II, reference solutions were determined for investments to assess the impact potential (e.g. avoided emissions) in a consistent manner.
BoF II intends to address the climate mitigation as well as the non-climate related environmental objectives in its investments.
Investment strategy
The purpose of BoF II is to build, hold and manage (including to divest) a portfolio of equity and equity-related and mezzanine investments (including convertible loans and subordinated revenue-based financing instruments) in portfolio companies with a potential positive impact on planet earth.
BoF II shall, in principle, pursue a long term and sustainable investment strategy. Therefore, BoF II only invests in early-stage start-ups that have
BoF II’s targeted investment sectors are i) energy and heat, ii) transport and mobility, iii) ag-tech, food and forestry, iv) real estate and construction activities, v) manufacturing, vi) water, sewage and waste and vii) IT/enabling technologies. BoF II intends to invest mainly in Europe and to make its initial investments in early stage, i.e., pre-seed, seed and series A rounds, of green technology companies.
Good governance practices, as stipulated within the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, are assessed through an ESG questionnaire as part of every due diligence process prior to any investment made by BoF II. Such practices include, in particular, sound management structures, employee relations, remuneration of staff and tax compliance within the portfolio companies. Moreover, BoF II will conduct annular surveys of the ESG practices in its portfolio companies during the holding period. If BoF II becomes aware of severe governance issues, it will investigate them and work with all parties involved to find an appropriate solution.
Proportion of investments
BoF II will only invest in line with its investment strategy, which can be summarized as follows: investing in early-stage (pre-seed, seed, series A) green technology companies primarily in Europe that have the potential to make a significant positive environmental impact globally. Therefore, BoF II will only (100 %) make sustainable investments within the meaning of Art. 2(17) SFDR in economic activities that qualify as environmentally sustainable under the EU Taxonomy.
BoF II will likely not invest in transitional economic activities. Therefore, the minimum share of investments in transitional economic activities is 0 %. As BoF II intends to invest in enabling (software) technologies that help others to generate a significant positive impact the minimum share expressed as a percentage of all investments of BoF II, is at least 1 %.
The degree to which BoF II’s sustainable investments are investments in environmentally sustainable economic activities is measured (by default) by turnover. Where information about the degree to which an investment in a (potential) portfolio company is in an environmentally sustainable economic activity is not readily available from public disclosures, such information will be obtained directly from the (potential) portfolio company.
Furthermore, BoF II and its portfolio companies comply with the minimum safeguards of Art. 18 Taxonomy.
The compliance of the investments with the Taxonomy will not be subject to an assurance by auditors or a review by third parties.
Monitoring of the sustainable investment objective
In order to monitor the sustainable investment objective and the sustainability indicators used to measure the attainment of the sustainable investment objective throughout the lifecycle of BoF II, impact performance data is being assessed on an annual basis. LCA data and models are updated in consultation with BoF II’s portfolio companies to reflect changes in their processes or products.
In addition, ESG-related information is collected and evaluated via an ESG questionnaire which is provided to BoF II’s portfolio companies on a regular basis. The (adverse) sustainability indicators for each portfolio company are also tracked using the ESG questionnaire.
Furthermore, the impact KPIs (defined below) defined for each portfolio company individually after an investment by BoF II, is/are tracked and reported annually to the fund.
BoF II requires its portfolio companies to provide an incident report in written form, if they become aware of any issue presenting a material risk for the realization of BoF II’s sustainable investment objective
Methodologies
BoF II intends to address climate mitigation as well as the non-climate related environmental objectives in its investments.
To achieve its objective of making sustainable investments in economic activities that qualify as environmentally sustainable under EU Taxonomy, Planet A, prior to all investments of BoF II, applies a science-based impact methodology that assesses the environmental impact of BoF II’s (potential) investments. BoF II’s science team conducts a LCA, where applicable, calculating the environmental footprint of potential portfolio company’s innovative product or service. The impact is assessed from two perspectives: (a) the science-based “improvement rate”, i.e., how much better a product or service really is, and (b) the business projections, i.e. the output at scale. In combination, this formula tells Planet A, for and on behalf of BoF II, the impact potential of its investments.
Where calculating LCAs is not possible, which may be the case with enabling technology companies, a qualitative impact assessment is applied based on scientific studies.
BoF II then defines impact KPI, i.e., sustainability indicators, to measure the attainment of its sustainable investment objective. Such indicator(s) is/are defined for each portfolio company individually after an investment by BoF II, subject to approval by the main investors, and such indicator(s) is/are tracked and reported annually.
After an investment, i.e. during the holding period, BoF II checks for adverse impacts on sustainability factors in regular intervals. Where information is not publicly available, the relevant data is collected either directly from the portfolio companies by using a table/dashboard application or by making reasonable assumptions.
When BoF II identifies principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors at portfolio company level, it will discuss on a case-by-case basis with each portfolio company appropriate actions to mitigate such adverse impacts, in particular considering other impacts of the investment, its size, strategic importance and transactional context.
Data sources and processing
The LCA data on a portfolio company’s product or service is sourced from the company itself. Where there is no specific data available on production processes and resources used the data is modelled or sourced from scientific studies. The LCAs are conducted by LCA experts who are extensively trained in LCAs norms and standards. They have access to well documented process data from the globally most widely used LCA databases.
In order to report and forecast the impact, the portfolio companies provide Planet A with current and projected business data (units sold, customers acquired etc.) in correspondence with the business plan. LCA data and models are updated in consultation with the portfolio companies to reflect changes in the company’s processes or products. In addition, target markets of start-ups are being monitored to detect and include significant changes that might affect the environmental performance of a portfolio company. This data is stored in Planet A`s data warehouse. No customer data will be requested or stored.
Limitations to methodologies and data
As Planet A invests in early-stage novel technologies, data can be incomplete or insufficiently granular. Uncertainty is an inevitable aspect of impact assessments. Planet A applies robust techniques to reduce and account for these, e.g. by applying parameterised models, sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis and Monte Carlo simulations. The data collected from the (potential) portfolio companies is not externally verified or audited.
Due diligence
In order to exclude any possible adverse effects, BoF II conducts a due diligence prior to each investment which includes a LCA or, where an LCA is not applicable, a scientific literature review to assess the environmental impact of a (potential) portfolio company’s product or service. BoF II uses an ESG questionnaire to identify and assess principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors as part of the pre-investment due diligence as well as in the post-investment monitoring and support processes.
Engagement policies
Engagement forms part of the sustainable investment objective of BoF II. With BoF II, Planet A aims to generate positive impact beyond BoF II’s portfolio companies by sharing learnings and scientific insights, cooperating with other Venture Capital funds as well as public institutions and foundations in order to advance the whole ecosystem. Planet A, for instance, contributes to impact trainings for generalist VCs and takes an active role in the Cleantech for Europe initiative, Tech for Net Zero, Project Frame, Startup Factories, WEF uplink, the Finance@Biodiversity Initiative of the European Commission and others. Planet A’s objective is to make impact investment the new normal. Planet A, on behalf of BoF II, will actively communicate and publish its ambitions and findings. This will also include advocacy to strengthen social entrepreneurship, purpose companies, more stringent impact measurement standards as well as more ambitious environmental legislation.
Planet A commits to adhere to ESG principles with regard to its own organization as well as BoF II. As venture capital investor, the influence Planet A has on BoF II’s portfolio companies through shareholdings, including influence on sustainability matters, is typically limited. However, Planet A will apply its best efforts to encourage BoF II’s portfolio companies to agree with BoF II’s ESG policy, and to commit to pursuing its ESG commitments. When sustainability-related issues are detected, BoF II encourages and supports actions for improvement.
Attainment of the sustainable investment objective
To examine the compliance of all investments of BoF II with the criteria pursuant to the Delegated Regulations above, BoF II assesses the environmental dimensions that are material to the company and sets target values for at least one of the following Impact KPIs, in line with the concept of the Planetary Boundaries: i) Climate Change, ii) Novel Entities, iii) Biogeochemical flows, iv) Land system change, v) Freshwater resources, vi) Biodiversity Loss; vii) Stratospheric Ozone Depletion, viii) Atmospheric Aerosol Loading, ix) Ocean Acidification.
BoF II applies specific metrics for each of these environmental categories, like tons of GHG emissions reduced or removed, m3 of water resources saved, tons of plastic waste etc. With regards to cases where impact cannot be quantified on the basis of an LCA, proxies are used to assess the systemic impact of the innovation.
BoF II uses a science-based methodology that assesses the climate and environmental impact of all its (potential) investments. To quantify the impact of a start-up’s innovative product or service BoF II assesses the climate and other environmental impacts associated with all stages of a product’s life – from raw material extraction through materials processing, manufacture, distribution, and use. The method also takes into account effects outside the product life cycle, i.e. in the wider system. This is called a “Consequential Life Cycle Assessment” (“C-LCA”). Assessing avoided emissions with the C-LCA is done in accordance with the European Commission, Recommendation 2013/179/EU(95) and leading standards, including ISO 14040 and 14044, GHG Protocol, and Project Frame. The C-LCA does not only allow for assessing GHG emissions but a broader understanding of emissions and resource consumption like water or land use.
In certain cases, BoF II may in its reasonable discretion reduce the scope and depth of such C-LCA appropriately in light of the size or strategic importance of such investment as well as its transactional context or apply an alternative appropriate scientific approach in lieu of a C-LCA to assess the company’s environmental impact.
By comparing the results with reference products on the market BoF II can assess how much better a start-up’s innovation is (=improvement rate). Impact is calculated by assessing the environmental improvement (impact perspective) and the growth of a company (business perspective).
This document has first been uploaded on 10 March 2021.
Date of updates: 7 May 2022 and 30 November 2022: implementation of recent legislative developments, and editorial amendments and clarifications; 30 June 2023: implementation of recent legislative developments and adding of consolidated first PAI statement.; 1 April 2024: Update of PAI statement; 10 February 2025: inclusion of the product Below One Fund II GmbH & Co. KG; May 4 2025, Update of PAI.
Please do not hesitate to contact us for further queries at hello@planet-a.com
